50 years ago, on October 4, 1957, the Soviet Union launched the first artificial satellite in the world into space, Sputnik 1. The launch was a total surprise, even to U.S. intelligence, which was taken completely by surprise. The satellite launch not only shocked the world, but that changed completely initiated a new era: the Space Age. Beyond that, the launch of Sputnik shocked and terrified the U.S. ruling class. After World War II, the U.S. ruling class feared the size and strength of the Soviet Army, which after all had defeated the Nazis and had taken effective control of half of Europe. However, despite the fact that the Soviets had developed the atomic bomb a few years after the U.S., many leaders and apparatchiks [1] American military believed that the Soviets were unable to develop sophisticated high-tech equipment. Of course, the Soviets could exploit a lot of natural resources and produce tons of steel (and tanks), but could not produce anything approaching the sophistication of American production techniques. All this changed in 1957 when the Soviet Union launched Sputnik, showing that the USSR had the ability to launch nuclear missiles at targets in and give you anywhere in the world. Before Sputnik, the average American would have believed that the U.S. was superior in all fields of technology, especially in space technology and rocket. This was an important propaganda victory for the USSR. Were the first to reach space. Fear and panic seized the U.S. ruling class. They wondered if perhaps the Interesting argument with the excellent journalist José Luis Jacobo, FM 99.9 in Mar del Plata: "Libya, Osama and Obama, and double standards in international politics." In addition, photo of Al Mutassim Al-Gaddafi (son of Colonel Muammar Gaddafi and National Security Adviser of Libya) with Hillary Clinton in the Treaty Room, Washington, DC, April 21, 2009. This photo is betrothed to Joseph Luis Jacob in the radio report. Moreover, the U.S. sold arms to Qaddafi and has the proof of that. Reporting Horacio Perez Tatiana Calderon, held in their area of Telesur, Caracas, Venezuela, in which it analyzes the unity pact signed in Cairo by alestinas factions led Fatah and Hamas. Horacio Calderon analyzed for Channel 26 in Manuel Castro the events surrounding the death of the leader, as well as the likely geopolitical consequences and the likely impact on relations between the U.S. and Pakistan. Radio communication with Jai, Horacio Calderon referred to the death of the leader of Al Qaeda and noted that it "will not have the greatest impact from the tactical point of view" and stressed that "no one should expect an attack like that of September 11, but some smaller scale. " With respect to the body of the terrorist leader sensed that "the fact that not show the dead body and thrown into the sea there is something to discuss." Although the attached document is part of a lecture given by our Director in the School of Army War Argentina in 2006, despite the time elapsed contains historical information and address to be the biography of Osama Bin Laden and the genesis of Al- Central Qaeda maintains current total. Osama Bin Laden had died in an attack by special forces command of the U.S., while the head of Al-Qaeda terrorist movement was hiding in a compound in Pakistan. If confirmed this news on where Bin Laden is found, it is of high probability of occurrence that the operation has been part of a joint effort of the U.S. and Pakistan. After 21 visits to Libya, Horacio Calderon offers a different look at the figure of Muammar Gaddafi, the rebellion against him and the NATO attacks. His first contact with Gaddafi was in January 1976, when as head of press and broadcasting from the University of Buenos Aires Argentina joined a delegation that traveled to Libya to attend a seminar on Islamic-Christian dialogue. Although I already knew and was interested in the figure of the Libyan revolutionary leader, who had come to power a few years ago, the personal encounter was something that would mark him forever. 'It was very interesting, in that we meet delegates from almost all Muslim countries on the one hand, and the Vatican on the other, represented by Cardinal Sergio Pignedoli, undersecretary of state for non-Christian cults. We sought to develop mechanisms for dialogue between religions. It was very innovative for its time. -Qaddafi interested me since joining the government of his country on 1 September 1969, because it is considered by Islamist groups, from that moment, as if he were a heretic. Overthrew King Idris, who belonged to the Sufi order, but rather strict rules. Because Islam has, in addition to Islamic law, various forms within the framework of justice and Islamic law to put into practice the teachings of the Koran. Since then, Gaddafi began making a series of religious and social transformations: women gradually brought home, where she was cloistered to take to school and then college. 'It Sufi, but from a very moderate. In short, Gaddafi Libyan law adapted so that they could run no more complicated precepts such as beheading. Was gradually creating a transformation in his country. It was what surprised me in the first instance. There was much social mobility, especially because they had the opportunity to study. There are professional women. What happens is that discrimination has occurred in sectors that are not close to the regime. But ultimately the problem is that the Libyans will not work because they are considered a rich country. -They are about two and a half million Libyans, then there are the foreigners. They divide the income and say they could be rich with this income per capita. In fact Gaddafi has given agricultural units, farms, that have left extinguishing for vagrancy, or have taken other slave labor countries. He has many problems in implementing your project. Behind all this is the fact that it is a tribal society. There are 150 tribes, of which 15 are major. -I do not know palaces in Libya. There are photos of the palace in Spain. His house has two floors. I celebrated a birthday at the home of the ministers and had nothing. No such lavishness. The houses are large spaces because they like large places. In addition, women are in a place and men in another. There is what was given to Saddam Hussein. -In March 2007, when I was with him at a fort in the desert city of sebja where they spoke to the heads of the tribes. It was interesting to be there. -What amazed me was his personal history. He was the son of Bedouin herders, people desperately poor. As a boy he had a vocation for the study, point to walk far from home to school and stayed to sleep on the floor of the mosque by the distance that separated him from his home. He always had great interest in excel. An anecdote: at school made him the focus Bedouin problem I had. Following that he began to study to acquire a classical Arabic. Yes. For example, one of the things that struck me was that during the meetings that were held in the seminary of Islamic-Christian dialogue, Gaddafi discussed of comparative theology with a fairly accurate, to the point of explaining why the location accurate Vatican City. It is also a person who has displayed an enormous political astuteness. A former CIA director said he is smarter than two desert foxes. And I think that somehow proved it. The problem is that it has established a political system in Libya, which is somewhat anarchic. He responds to it, there is vertical with respect to his person. Is anarchic because he told the Libyans "Each of you is Gaddafi" and the problem is that they believe it. 'There's a burnout among middle and lower sectors of the people driving. The committee led a popular may have a position against the other and coexist. Now, it will be very difficult, if overthrow Gaddafi, to deal with the Libyans. They are opening the door to a model in the best case would seem to Iraq, and in the worst case to that of Somalia. It's kind of postmodern neocolonialism. It may be a failed state in the presence of Islamist groups. -Since the inauguration of his government in Libya so far has done everything that Gaddafi has been against extremist schools of thought of Sunni Islam. In May 1984, when I was at Tripoli airport, I attended what was an assassination attempt on Gaddafi, who was aborted. Were groups of the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt, Libya branch. Gaddafi met a determined-from 1976 to 1985. During that period, I had the most important interviews. It seemed to me a person who had a particular approach to things. Then came the Lockerbie bombing. I think that Gaddafi never gave the order to commit the attack. Nor Musa Kusa, the former foreign minister who defected Gaddafi and went to Britain. If they had something to do either of them, Musa Kusa would be arrested. 'I think there was no order to attack Gaddafi's plane, but just based on this anarchic system, do not rule that may have existed an interest. Of only two Libyans accused, one was acquitted, and the other was released by a suspected cancer and Libya in exchange for not appealing the trial. Here there was an alleged crime, a terrorist attack by a state. There was also a voluminous amount of money in compensation for the dead. Personally, it was immoral. Since 1988, the year of Lockerbie, until 1999 I did not want to return to Libya until the issue was resolved. This resented my relationship with them. – Yes, he supported movements in Africa and Latin America, including the ETA and the IRA. But in Argentina, during the 70, did not support any of the warring parties. – It was a third way against liberal capitalism and communism. Very clear. Has points in common with the third PJ de Perón. What happens is that, from a geopolitical point of view, to take a stand against radical Gaddafi to Israel, needed the support of the USSR, he being not even left-to balance against pressures from Europe had and the USA. 'It's a radical critique of modern classical democracy. Contests all the institutions of this system of government, challenges the existence of political parties, parliament, or referendum. Accept or not the system of universal suffrage. He speaks of the government of all and for all. To understand the specific form of the application of this theory in Libya, it would be like if the only representative system of Argentina was composed exclusively of basic units nationwide PJ. O radical caucuses. Then the organs of direct democracy, as he calls it, these committees would be constituted by popular base, which in turn report to the district, regional, etc., Culminating in the People's Congress, which is ultimately in choose whole country authorities. Therefore no charge Gadhafi in Libya, he started as head of the Revolutionary Command Council, which was the first military body since 1969. , Want a universal replication. The Green Paper speaks of two main pillars: religion and nationalism. I can understand that what he proposes is valid from the standpoint of the Catholic religion from nationalism of a country. His book is translated into 70 languages. In short, the Green Paper is written to be studied, because he is a challenger of Western-style democracy. -Is a person who came to the government of his country at age 27 as captain, and say that he was plotting virtually since he was 15. Apart from his military career as an activist within the schools. At the time, had been expelled following a demonstration. He studied at Sebha, a key city located in the middle of the desert in the middle of Libya, where he rebelled against an English teacher named Johnson, along with a group of friends who came to the conclusion that they would never reach Libya's government if it were part of the Armed Forces. So they went and were weaving contacts in the military. During this period he was sent to Britain and returned to Libya to continue with the coup. There were 12 members of an organization called Free Unionist Officers Movement, which was equivalent to what he did Nasser in Egypt, and also a parallel with the Group of United Officers Peron. It lasted three years, approximately. Took power in a bloodless manner when King Iris was out of Libya. Gaddafi's idea was an idea UTs. Today Libya is divided into three regions: Fezzan, Cyrenaica and Tripolitania. So now the divisions between East and West are less clear. Libya is composed of 150 tribes, of which 15 are part of the two pillars supporting the current regime, the other Armed Forces are composed of members of these tribes, which, incidentally, have not removed the support. 'I saw you Primea Al-Jazeera was attacked by aircraft Gaddafi rebels. Then I sought to corroborate the information with people linked to U.S. intelligence, not active, and the truth is that there was no sign of satellite images of planes attacking. I make the parallel with the revolution of 55 in Argentina, where crude bombs killed 500 people and there were over 1000 wounded. Calculate, with a missile of this type of planes flew half square. Gaddafi does not have a problem similar to what happened in Tunisia or Egypt. It's totally separate. -Initially, it was a Strike Command in which police seized, hanged and burned in front of everyone. People also burned the palace to provoke a response from Gaddafi. Earlier in November, the Chief of Protocol of Gaddafi, who had traveled to France, was recruited by the Secret Service Gauls. He made contacts in Benghazi, because as Chief of Protocol knew who was for and who against. Then the philosopher Bertrand Henry-Levy convince Sarkozy: a reunion, leads the Libyan rebels were led by the former Minister of Interior, Abdel Fattah Younis al Abidi, and Jusitica minister, Mustafa Abdulyalil. -The one that started all this is France, which later joined England. The great ideologist was Sarkozy. They came with the bag of the poor performance they had in the conflict in Tunisia, where the Chancellor was linked to corruption. That was the reason why the French president took the initiative. In parallel, we add the poor image of Sarkozy regarding the forthcoming elections: French, historically, have never been against intervention, because for them the country's image improves. Third, apart from a domestic policy issue, it is a confrontation between Britain and France on the one hand and Germany and Italy, on the other. It's like sending a message. Somehow it feels like second best France against the power of Germany. What France has shown that it is one of the few European countries, along with Britain, projecting power beyond the continent. 'No threat, but not the same resources to negotiate with a country that is sovereign and owner of its oil, which keep the oil and the conditions. -If the Warfalla tribe, which is the most important of all, with one million members, rose against Gaddafi, had not left anything behind the leader. Then there is the Gaddafa, which belongs Gaddafi, who is also very important. It has the most relevance and exercising the most important positions. Following are 15 tribes in total, plus his wife's tribe, Al Barazi, which also has enough interference in the government of Libya. They have not removed the support, including tribal loyalty, in some cases has been high, rewarding loyalty directly to Gaddafi. There are family members fighting among themselves. I try to be as objective as I can about it. If members of the top 15 tribes that make up the Armed Forces and Brigadier Hamish, disagree, probably would have stood against the Libyan leader. -The former Minister of Justice, Mustafa Abdulyalil, and the former Minister of Interior, Abdel Fattah Younis, who were in office until 50 days ago. If they are the representatives of the rebellion and are backed by a force, which has even gone beyond the UN mandate, it gives me the impression that this goal is not to save the lives of unarmed civilians. What gives me the pattern of all is the double standard of conduct of members of the Security Council of the UN voted for the intervention. Obama, hesitant, has been heavily influenced by Hillary Clinton, Secretary of Estdado, Susan Rice, U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, and Samantha Power, special assistant to the president, the architect of this. It's a shame, because on one hand is used as an instrument of international humanitarian law (R2P) and secondly, does not provide the same position in cases such as Yemen or Syria. -The U.S. has no strategic interests in Libya. Accompanied it. This trio of women, who pushed and convinced Obama not to stop the intervention and to participate actively in the early stages. But there were differences within the Security Council, we are talking about members with veto power and those who do not. Brazil, for example, abstained, Germany, did not oppose for convenience and geopolitical strategies. China could not oppose a decision supported by a minority of the Arab League, led by Saudi Arabia, because it depends on oil sends the Arab country. For its part, Russia is that the U.S. should go bogged down in various settings to boost its own geopolitical resurgence. -I think it's an open ending to three scenarios. One would be the partition of Libya within the framework of a civil war. The other scenario is an overthrow of the Qadhafi regime through a military intervention with ground forces. This would cause a massive presence of Islamist extremist elements, because they can raise as banner the presence of foreign troops. There are in fact al-Qaeda clerics calling for jihad against Gaddafi and foreigners present. The third scenario is the more serious type model Somalia with a totally split. -I do not think they killed him because they still have not. If France can identify the place where it is, kill it. Dead Gaddafi is a solved problem. Or a serious problem in the future. I see likely to allow Gaddafi to win this war. Would have won if not for the French intervention. Horacio Calderon was interviewed yesterday on CNN in Spanish by journalist Patricia Janiot, in the "Our World", the prestigious daily in this period leading news network. Our Director reiterates once again its position known from the beginning of the first events in Libya, reports that the attacks by those who called the "Coalition of the hypocrites" have no other aim than to overthrow the regime of Colonel Muammar Gaddafi and seize the country's natural wealth. This time also addresses the crisis in Syria, commenting on what the power structure that holds the Alawite regime of President Bashar Al-Assad. Our Director, Horacio Calderon, he was interviewed this morning by journalist Guillermo Parada de Radio Universidad Nacional de Colombia, about student demonstrations in the Algerian capital, which had a mass character. Calderon addressed the profile of the protests and compared with those elsewhere. Also. and stop at a question of who had received the notice of your conference, Calderon advanced some points of his future dissertation, which .. Our site recommends C5N special program that will air at 23:00 on the day of the date, April 14, 2011, under the leadership of Paul Kablan "Narco Invasion – The FARC's drug and Argentina conxión" with brief reflections of our director. For this is part our Director, Horacio Calderon, will give a lecture followed by questions, which is the above title, which will take place in Chancery area of the City of Buenos Aires on April 27, 2011 when 18 : 30. Those media wishing to attend and enter TV cameras or photography should register in advance, in order to facilitate their access and better conditions for their work. A shame confirmed: now the Alte. James Stavridis, commander of NATO allies in Europe, now admits that there are terrorists of Al-Qaeda and Hizballah on the front anti-Khadafi. Exactly, who is projected to assemble. A real scandal and it told a Senate committee in your country. It's like if you tried to build closer to the FARC if they face such a future to a Colombian government desired by a "coalition of hypocrites" as the current one. That was said hours after the speech of the "Nobel Peace / Warlord" Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton claims that have left open the possibility of supplying arms to the rebels, which is already being done covertly. The model replica of Iraq, Afghanistan and Somalia to the gates of Europe, for example put Italy on the brink of a humanitarian collapse, without prejudice to Libya remain in the hands of the cream of Islamist terrorism. Now is not I who say so, but a NATO commander in front of a committee of the Senate, where the prison can cost lie to anyone. This should also strip the covert actions of France and Great Britain, prior to the strike against Libya, as was the recruitment in Paris late last year, the chief of protocol Mumammar Khadafi, who provided contacts and military secrets to unleash the rebellion . Also, the geopolitical and domestic causes that moved "Napoleon" Sarkozy as "British Petroleum" Cameron to attack Libya. For example, Investigate if a few months before France was rejected by Libya to sell Rafale fighter planes and nuclear power plants. This model could be replicated in Argentina in the distant future, with carte blanche from the UN, if a group of powers to decide for example that we have violated international humanitarian law in the Argentine Patagonia or North under a casus belli invented as did in Iraq before and after Libya. Afghanistan is a war with legitimacy of origin and is a separate chapter. My thanks to all media, including CNN in Spanish, which allowed me to be a voice and allows more antre the few, denouncing this very serious hoax raised against Libya, without this calling into question the responsibilities that could have the Libyan leader their relatives, in violation of the conventions and protocols governing ations such as those now taking place in this country. Our Director, Horacio Calderon was interviewed today by journalist Danny Saltzman in the space of "Coffee Break" which is broadcast daily on Radio Jai. The main issue revolved around the recent resignation of the Syrian cabinet, and the growing conflict in the country and throughout the Arab world. He stressed that "who was confirmed as the new interim prime minister is the same as it was before" and remarked that "behind the riots in the Arab world is the shadow of a growing extremist Islam." Our Director, Horacio Calderon, was interviewed by journalist Thomas Del Duca in its "Saturday Radio", broadcast by Radio Rivadavia. Calderon gave an overview on the current situation in Libya. He said among other items: "The roots of conflict are geopolitical and economic order, because if there had been no outside intervention, Khadafi had ended with the rebellion, even with bows and arrows, and he has not lost the support of tribal federation ". He also discussed Barack Obama's visit to Brazil and Chile, but said that in the case of the first country had not been successful in their central vacuum, which was to get U.S. backing for a permanent seat on the Security Council of the UN. On the other hand and the possibility that Argentina abandon the investigation of the AMIA bombing and the Embassy of Israel in exchange for retaining its diplomatic relations with Iran and increase trade relations, said he had not been officially verified, but if true would be a "scandal." To finish and to a question about Argentina's relations with the U.S., said they were damaged, especially from the case of the seizure of American material, which .. The newspaper "Clarín" published in the days of the date made an interesting report by retired General Julian Thompson, commander of British forces in the Falklands during the war of 1982, and is now a military analyst, who agrees in several points the assessments made by Horacio Calderon neocolonial aggression against Libya. Although from and fails to mention the purpose of the operations of the "Coalition of the Hypocrites" against Libya (after all, is British and commanded the forces of his country in the Falkland Islands during our war against the United Kingdom in 1982), views introduction to law books on the "barter" observed in recent weeks by General Thompson, can not remain outside of any table analysis. Our Director, Horacio Calderon has responded to massive series of reports ua during the last day, after a long editing efforts are available on their YouTube channel. To facilitate access to these interviews are included here the titles and links that lead to the different parties that are divided the same because of the limits imposed by the YouTube application:. "The international analyst and writer Horacio Calderon, an expert on Middle East and North Africa, and counterterrorism specialist, was interviewed by journalist Fernando del Rincon in the" Our World "in Spanish CNN of March 2, 2011, which this prestigious professional leads in conjunction with Patricia Janiot. The respondent explicitly stated his suspicion that trying to create a casus belli to the model allowed the invasion of Iraq, for the purpose of a military strike against Libya, destroying its air force and its armored brigades and retry the murder of Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, to finally seize its energy resources. He also demanded that the Argentine government deplore any foreign military intervention in Libya. ". The special program was conducted by Claudio Rigoli, with the participation of Luis Rosales (C5N), political scientist and Mariano Waters. An analysis of the crisis in Libya, at which time our Director spoke about the neo-colonial interests of Islamist extremism and that, in his view, converge in their preparation, pop and development. Report Horacio Calderon CVC chain of Miami, Florida, USA, conducted a few days ago, in which the respondent discussed the crisis in the Arab terriotorios and emerging threats to security and the very existence of Israel. Fragment of the long interview of Paul Fernádez Horacio Calderon, which was broadcast on Sunday February 26, 2011 on "All Afternoon," which airs Saturdays on Channel 26. In a documentary made by Maxi Montenegro in its "Plan M", which airs on Channel 26, Horacio Calderon made a public complaint about the Anglo-American operation that aims to seize the Libyan oil fields. He also said that the string "Al-Jazeera" had become a propaganda ministry of Islamic extremism. "On the instability of political regimes that govern the affected regions, it is the end of a historical cycle, characterized by the longevity of the regimes, while connected with the leaders who have run for years. If speaks of the "domino effect", as in the game that does not repeat numbers in the cases in quite the same. The profile of countries like Morocco and Algeria where a person was burned and started it all, is totally different. Everyone branches of theology, beliefs and cultures, so the chapter can not be compared with the Egyptian Libyan or Tunisian. "As to how the events impact on Libya in other Arab countries, the outbreak was not due to an onset of protest in the Egyptian style, characterized by the presence of better-off middle class and able to mobilize people through social networks like Facebook and Twitter. In the case of Libya, all began with an armed militia, well organized and trained, which began its operations by burning the building of the "People's Palace," which could be compared to the Casa Rosada in our countries, then continued with the "Palace of the Congress "and lynched police, which provovó the response of Moammar Khadafi advocacy groups. Events subsequent fires by Al-Jazeera, like all the "domino effect" that has seen so far, which has become the propaganda ministry of Islamic extremism. "Regarding the current political system in Libya, this could only be considered a dictatorship as the Western concept of democracy. While it is very difficult to explain, is de facto a kind of autocracy backed by a court system that Khadafi implemented anarchic in this country. It is as if we were in Argentina ruled by basic units, based on a kind of self-government. "What happens in Libya is the result of a blow-style war Iraq to justify the invasion of a country that has four trillion dollars of oil reserves. You create a casus bellis through a monumental propaganda campaign, with the difference that this time, instead of weapons of mass destruction and al Qaeda connections to Saddam Hussein that was supposed to, allegations were proved false then be invent massive aerial bombardment against demonstrators, which no service has been proven satellite imagery. "Ultimately, those who light the fire are the Al Qaeda Central, which has a column Libya," Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb ", which does include a group of Libyan terrorists. They and Al-Jazeera light the fire and Anglo-American alliance is preparing to "turn off" as they did in Iraq. ".